| Manual lumbar traction table | Uses therapist-controlled positioning and manual force; generally has fewer mechanical controls and a lower purchase cost. | Patients needing short, closely supervised sessions or conservative trial treatment before considering motorized equipment. | Force and treatment consistency depend heavily on clinician technique. It may be less suitable for repeated, precisely measured traction protocols. | Stable frame, adjustable height, secure pelvic support, comfortable padding, and easy therapist access. |
| Motorized intermittent traction table | Provides programmable cycles of traction and relaxation, with adjustable duration, force, and treatment position. | Selected patients with mechanical low-back pain or radiating leg symptoms when a clinician determines that a monitored traction trial is appropriate. | Clinical research shows mixed results; traction should not replace exercise, education, activity modification, or treatment of the underlying condition. | Accurate force adjustment, emergency stop control, audible or visual treatment indicators, pelvic harness fit, and documented maintenance. |
| Split-section or flexion-distraction table | Allows controlled movement between table sections and may combine positioning with low-force manual treatment techniques. | Patients who tolerate prone positioning and may benefit from carefully selected manual mobilization or flexion-based techniques. | Not appropriate for every spinal disorder. Symptoms may worsen if positioning or movement is poorly selected. | Smooth section movement, reliable locking mechanisms, adjustable head and pelvic support, and clear weight limits. |
| Supine lumbar traction table | Positions the patient on the back and typically uses a pelvic harness or similar restraint to apply longitudinal force. | Patients who cannot comfortably lie prone or who experience better symptom tolerance in a supine position. | Patients with breathing difficulty when supine, severe hip problems, or intolerance to harness pressure require particular caution and clinical assessment. | Backrest adjustment, harness comfort, low entry height, patient communication controls, and adequate clearance for transfers. |
| Prone lumbar traction table | Positions the patient face down and may provide access for soft-tissue work or other supervised clinical procedures. | Patients who tolerate prone positioning and whose symptoms are not aggravated by lying face down. | Use caution with pregnancy, facial or airway concerns, shoulder problems, reflux, breathing disorders, and patients unable to turn safely. | Face opening or head support, breathing comfort, padding quality, safe access for transfers, and stable pelvic restraint. |
| Table with pelvic and lumbar positioning adjustments | Offers adjustable lumbar support, pelvic tilt, knee support, or table angle to improve comfort and treatment positioning. | Patients whose symptoms vary with spinal flexion, extension, pelvic position, or knee support. | More adjustment options increase setup complexity and require appropriate clinician training. | Range of motion, adjustment speed, lock strength, padding thickness, weight capacity, and ease of cleaning. |
| Portable or compact traction unit | Designed for limited-space clinical environments; may provide fewer position and force adjustments than a full-size table. | Clinics that need occasional supervised traction and have limited room or a lower equipment budget. | Reduced stability, smaller treatment surface, and limited adjustability may affect patient comfort and clinical versatility. | Foldability, locking casters, overall footprint, safe working load, harness security, and storage requirements. |